🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat state that indecision on how best to address the issue is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation sets out a series of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer locations. Officials say it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline lies the grave of a ex-soldier killed while serving overseas. His parent said she could not sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to think this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Certainty

The lack of agreement over when and how to tackle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Some want more sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to continue for now. Different voices contend the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need productive community discussions to find the right answers for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in life after death, providing a theological perspective on the temporal loss of sacred ground.